1 |
On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky <hslists2@××××××.sk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <hslists2@××××××.sk> wrote: |
5 |
> RF> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
6 |
> RF> |
7 |
> RF> > RF> Regardless, if there are packages you feel are ready to go |
8 |
> RF> > RF> to stable, you can file bugs on bugs.gentoo.org to |
9 |
> RF> > RF> request stabilization. |
10 |
> RF> > |
11 |
> RF> > Of course I can but I want to point out that this should happen |
12 |
> RF> > occasionally. I reported several packages to be keyworded for amd64 |
13 |
> RF> > year ago and none of them is stable yet. So it seems to me that |
14 |
> RF> > this is not "bug", this is a "rule". |
15 |
> RF> |
16 |
> RF> Are these packages stable for x86? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Yes, they are stable for x86. |
19 |
|
20 |
Can you give an example or two? |
21 |
|
22 |
-Richard |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |