| 1 |
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 07:56:46 Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 18 May 2010 23:22:03 Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > This is the first time I am dabbling with layman. So it is likely I |
| 5 |
> > > have made some noob mistake, which I hope you can help me discover. |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > I have installed layman-1.3.3 and then added the enlightenment overlay. |
| 8 |
> > > I have also added the snapshot keywords for enlightenment: |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > # ls -l /etc/portage/package.keywords/enlightenment.keywords |
| 11 |
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 64 May 18 21:28 |
| 12 |
> > > /etc/portage/package.keywords/enlightenment.keywords -> |
| 13 |
> > > /var/lib/layman/enlightenment/scripts/package.keywords.snapshots |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > entrance is unmasked in there: |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords/enlightenment.keywords | grep |
| 18 |
> > > entrance x11-misc/entrance ~* |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > However, although I can see enlightenment, I have no success with |
| 21 |
> > > entrance: |
| 22 |
> > > |
| 23 |
> > > # emerge -upDv entrance |
| 24 |
> > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 25 |
> > > |
| 26 |
> > > Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "entrance". |
| 29 |
> > > |
| 30 |
> > > |
| 31 |
> > > What am I missing? Please ask for supporting info as you need it. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > entrance no longer exists in the overlay, looks like it is gone for good: |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > Changeset 372 |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> > Timestamp: |
| 38 |
> > 02/28/10 14:01:41 (3 months ago) |
| 39 |
> > |
| 40 |
> > Author: |
| 41 |
> > tommy |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> > Message: |
| 44 |
> > x11-misc/ entrance: Remove entrance: old and unmaintained, there |
| 45 |
> > |
| 46 |
> > is currently a rewrite from scratch planned, but no ETA |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> :-( |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> So, no Display Manager for enlightenment? How do people start it up - it |
| 51 |
> seems odd to use e.g. the u xdm to do the job. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Well it's a display manager, you can use any one you feel like. There's no |
| 54 |
requirement that a KDE user must use Konqueror, they can use Firefox if they |
| 55 |
wish. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
e17 users have many options: start, slim, xdm, gdm, kdm, *dm .... |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-- |
| 61 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives