| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:45:40PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009 21:32:56 schrieb forgottenwizard: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > However, I'm also wondering why the ebuild doesn't make use of the |
| 5 |
> > EDITOR variable as was mentioned. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Because that's the worst thing to do. An ebuild's behaviour should not depend |
| 8 |
> on env variables (like it's still the case for this stupid grub ebuild), |
| 9 |
> because the user never get's to see this. There are other possibilities, i.e. |
| 10 |
> something like LINGUAS or VIDEO_CARDS, which are immediately visible. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Bye... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Dirk |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So instead it should set a non-existant editor to the configured |
| 18 |
default? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Another variable in make.conf may be a reasonable fix for this though |
| 21 |
I'm sure someone will bitch about having to set $EDITOR twice on their |
| 22 |
system. |
Archives