| 1 |
On Thursday 17 May 2012 20:25:01 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Outlook Express? Not even MS would attach the label "flagship" to |
| 4 |
> Outlook Express. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
A recent experience has suggested a reason for OE to work the way it |
| 7 |
does. Using it the way it's designed to be used, the entire conversation |
| 8 |
so far is included in every message; this will save mucho casho for |
| 9 |
those organisations that don't want to store e-mails - they rely on |
| 10 |
being able to scan an incoming e-mail to find out what it's all about. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Not an efficient use of bandwidth. In fact it's an abuse of network |
| 13 |
operators to relieve user companies of their responsibilities. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Rgds |
| 17 |
Peter |
Archives