1 |
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:14:08 -0700 |
2 |
ny6p01@×××××.com wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:47:56PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
5 |
> > On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer |
6 |
> > <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote: |
7 |
> > > If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course |
8 |
> > > comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most |
9 |
> > > of the time this is a bit tedious. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Interesting... so, you have someone standing next to you most of |
12 |
> > the time, pointing a gun at your head, forcing you to use one of |
13 |
> > the worst mail clients that ever existed? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> How befitting that MS's flagship email client top posts by default... |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Outlook Express? Not even MS would attach the label "flagship" to |
20 |
Outlook Express. |
21 |
|
22 |
Mind you, Outlook is infernally difficult to make it inter-port or |
23 |
bottom-post. Like gmail's web clientt, there's a lot of fiddling with |
24 |
backspace, delete, undo and cursor keys involved. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Alan McKinnnon |
30 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |