| 1 |
Nick Rout wrote: |
| 2 |
> every mail filter I need fits nicely into postfix. Which one are you |
| 3 |
> having problems with? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> and I don't think this is the place to discuss enhancements to postfix, |
| 6 |
> go join postfix-user and discuss it with the developers. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I could swear I've said this before, but there are a number of us that |
| 9 |
use postfix and find this on more on topic than what my favorite window |
| 10 |
environment might be or how to make an ebuild for a desktop game. So |
| 11 |
again I'll quietly ignore the things I don't care about and you will do |
| 12 |
the same. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
However adding milter support to Postfix may not be the magic bullet. |
| 15 |
Milters take this path through Sendmail |
| 16 |
mail queue -> milter -> delivery | /dev/null | whatever |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Postfix content filters take this path. |
| 19 |
mail queue -> cfilter -> mail queue -> etc |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Allowing people to run what are normally very efficient milters within |
| 22 |
Postfix may allow a few admins to shoot themselves in the foot |
| 23 |
performance-wise. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
In any case you might want to check out this how-to which use Anomy |
| 26 |
Sanitizer to do basically the same thing. |
| 27 |
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
kashani |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives