Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Any interest in a postfix/milter bridge?
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:57:26
Message-Id: 1126687851.12851.46.camel@sf.rout.dyndns.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] OT: Any interest in a postfix/milter bridge? by Dave Nebinger
1 every mail filter I need fits nicely into postfix. Which one are you
2 having problems with?
3
4
5 and I don't think this is the place to discuss enhancements to postfix,
6 go join postfix-user and discuss it with the developers.
7
8
9 On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 22:21 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
10 > I'm currently running postfix as my mail system. Unlike a recent post which
11 > assumed that postfix was overkill compared to sendmail, I tend to feel the
12 > opposite, that sendmail is bloated much more than the more simplified
13 > postfix.
14 >
15 > However, when looking for spam blockers, virus checkers, and other message
16 > processors, you will typically find multiple sendmail milter implementations
17 > as opposed to the postfix filter implementation.
18 >
19
20 >
21 --
22 Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz>
23
24 --
25 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-user] OT: Any interest in a postfix/milter bridge? Dave Nebinger <dnebinger@××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Any interest in a postfix/milter bridge? kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net>