| 1 |
Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <<< SNIP >>> |
| 5 |
> 2. Would anyone who is using eudev please post udev/eudev related |
| 6 |
> contents of both package.mask and package.keywords? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The reason I ask for #2 is, I've been playing with pretending emerging |
| 9 |
> after modifying package.keywords and .mask, and am confused (see the |
| 10 |
> following errors): |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> With *only* "sys-fs/eudev ~amd64" in package.keywords and *nothing* in |
| 13 |
> package.mask, I get the following (as expected because I must first |
| 14 |
> unmerge "sys-fs/udev" before emerging eudev): |
| 15 |
> <<< SNIP >>> |
| 16 |
> So, the questions are: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Do I actually and really need *anything* udev/eudev related in |
| 19 |
> package.mask, and what, in addition to sys-fs/eudev ~amd64, do I need |
| 20 |
> in package.keywords? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Thanks again to all... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Incidentally, I'm writing this experience up and will post to the list |
| 25 |
> (with permission to anyone to add to the wiki or anywhere else) once |
| 26 |
> I'm done... |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I have this in package.keywords |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
sys-fs/eudev |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I did mask the -9999 version tho since I didn't want to get that brave |
| 36 |
in the future. I'm not sure if you have to keyword or unmask anything |
| 37 |
now that it is not beta and been tested more. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Dale |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
:-) :-) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives