| 1 |
Am 12.04.2011 18:53, schrieb James: |
| 2 |
> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Everything I try within grub indicated the filesystem is unknown. |
| 5 |
> This stumps me.... |
| 6 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250829 |
| 7 |
> Bug above looks like this grub support of ext4 was |
| 8 |
> flushed out and fixed some time ago? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Maybe unmount the boot partition, reformat it to ext2 copy over the kernrel |
| 11 |
>> (run what mdadm commands again) remount and see if it works? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> This is still my best idea, if nobody has any other ideas? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> James |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Your boot partition is not by any chance a logical partition and |
| 20 |
therefore would be (hd0,4) and not (hd0,0)? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Also: According to this bug [1], grub gained support for md metadata 1.0 |
| 23 |
in 2010. Maybe this has not yet been merged into Gentoo (or legacy grub, |
| 24 |
at all). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
You can try to use 0.90 metadata by specifying it while creating the |
| 27 |
RAID with mdadm. I'm using it myself because AFAIK this is the only way |
| 28 |
for grub to handle a single RAID containing partitions instead of |
| 29 |
partitions containing RAIDs. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
[1] http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10196 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Hope this helps, |
| 34 |
Florian Philipp |
Archives