1 |
From: |
2 |
Richard Cox <conardcox@×××××.com> |
3 |
To: |
4 |
Roy Wright <roy@××××××.org> |
5 |
Date: |
6 |
Today 01:08:51 |
7 |
> > Gentoo is difficult to install. |
8 |
|
9 |
A highly subjective statement to be sure. Many thousands have successfully |
10 |
installed it...depends on your definition of 'difficult' I suppose. |
11 |
|
12 |
>>Also, if it's left un-updated for |
13 |
>> longer periods of time, it tends to break on the next update. |
14 |
So does any dynamic system that is allowed to stagnate. May I propose a |
15 |
solution? Don't leave it un-updated for 'a long period of time'. It's not |
16 |
that hard, really...if you are super paranoid, just emerge --sync once a week |
17 |
and then emerge -up --deep world...I know, that's rocket science, but it can |
18 |
give you an up-to-date system with little trouble...assuming you have |
19 |
internet access, of course. |
20 |
|
21 |
Again, I suppose that depends on what you mean by 'a long period of time'. |
22 |
Let Debian or any other distro remain un-updated for a year or more tell me |
23 |
about how easy it is to update without breaking. Actually, that wasn't |
24 |
fair...because you are basically going to do a re-install (or version |
25 |
upgrade, as many distros call it these days) when that happens. |
26 |
|
27 |
On Sunday 28 December 2008 00:50:32 you wrote: |
28 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
29 |
> > Gentoo is difficult to install. Also, if it's left un-updated for |
30 |
> > longer periods of time, it tends to break on the next update. I guess |
31 |
> > that's the downside of being versionless. Debian on the other hand, due |
32 |
> > to it being versioned, doesn't have that problem. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> When I ran an internal gentoo server at my last job, I would try to |
35 |
> schedule an update about once a month. That was a lesson learned after |
36 |
> the box just worked great for 7 months, then we wanted to add a new |
37 |
> application that needed newer libraries, that turned into a 2 day |
38 |
> marathon to update the server (it was old, slow hardware). |
39 |
> |
40 |
> I will predict that you will most miss portage after having to deal with |
41 |
> the brain dead apt package manager. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Good Luck |
44 |
|
45 |
On Sunday 28 December 2008 00:50:32 Roy Wright wrote: |
46 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
47 |
> > Gentoo is difficult to install. Also, if it's left un-updated for |
48 |
> > longer periods of time, it tends to break on the next update. I guess |
49 |
> > that's the downside of being versionless. Debian on the other hand, due |
50 |
> > to it being versioned, doesn't have that problem. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> When I ran an internal gentoo server at my last job, I would try to |
53 |
> schedule an update about once a month. That was a lesson learned after |
54 |
> the box just worked great for 7 months, then we wanted to add a new |
55 |
> application that needed newer libraries, that turned into a 2 day |
56 |
> marathon to update the server (it was old, slow hardware). |
57 |
> |
58 |
> I will predict that you will most miss portage after having to deal with |
59 |
> the brain dead apt package manager. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> Good Luck |