1 |
On 1/19/2012 05:29 AM, Chris Walters wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
3 |
>> Hello! |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> From what I know for sure, many people in different countries |
6 |
>> supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that |
7 |
>> this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can easily be |
8 |
>> repeated anywhere. And the point of opposing the US government |
9 |
>> decisions for people in other countries, to my mind, is to state there |
10 |
>> point of view *before* their local government try to do the same. And |
11 |
>> that's important. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Regards, |
14 |
>> Vladimir |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> ----- |
17 |
>> <v_2e@×××.net> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> There are also points that: |
20 |
> 1. These bills go way beyond filtering to a mandate to for Internet backbone |
21 |
> providers block entire domains on the basis of one complaint of IP infringement |
22 |
> - no evidence need be provided and there is no hearing. This would have an |
23 |
> effect on the Internet, as a whole, since much Internet traffic goes through |
24 |
> the US infrastructure. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> 2. These bills criminalize something that no other country I am aware of has |
27 |
> criminalized - IP (Copyright, Patent, and Trademark) infringement. It would |
28 |
> become a 5 year felony to "violate" this law. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> 3. The US is well known for its efforts to apply US law to the citizens of |
31 |
> other countries - in fact, they are already doing this the a student from the |
32 |
> United Kingdom. The US has demanded the extradition of this non-US citizen to |
33 |
> face criminal charges in the US, for something that is NOT unlawful in the U.K. |
34 |
> It also eliminates the US Copyright tradition of "fair use". |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I urge you to watch the Youtube video that I linked to, and to visit those |
37 |
> sites. The more people who become aware of the truth of these bills, their |
38 |
> sponsors, and the danger to not only US citizens, but also to citizens of any |
39 |
> country that has an extradition treaty with the US, the better. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> There is another issue that would threaten the existence of Gentoo, Debian, and |
42 |
> basically any GNU/Linux or *BSD distribution. Most distros I have seen include |
43 |
> LAME, either as source (in the case of Gentoo) or in binary form. Well, guess |
44 |
> what. The mp3 encoder algorithms that LAME uses are heavily patent encumbered. |
45 |
> This means that one complaint by the patent holders and Gentoo or any other |
46 |
> distro that includes LAME (yes, even only as source code), could result in ALL |
47 |
> Internet providers in the US being required to actively block the entire domain |
48 |
> for the distro, and ALL of its mirrors (which include many Universities and |
49 |
> some of them would take preemptive action and stop mirroring all distros lest |
50 |
> they be effectively shut down, especially if they are US-based). There are |
51 |
> other patent encumbered packages in most distros, and any of them could result |
52 |
> in a total block of them and their mirrors if a complaint is issued. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> This is why I was so shocked that the GNU/Linux and *BSD communities have not |
55 |
> been more active in opposing these bills. The definition of infringement is so |
56 |
> broad that it could and would be easily abused by the profiteers of the US that |
57 |
> support them (actually, most of the supporters are multinational corporations). |
58 |
> This threatens the whole of what the Internet has stood for since its very |
59 |
> beginnings. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> Off my soap box, so to speak, |
62 |
> Chris |
63 |
|
64 |
Well, at least my original post caused some conversation and maybe caused some |
65 |
people to think about this proposed legislation, research it and consider the |
66 |
effects that it might have upon the Gentoo, and the whole GNU/Linux and *BSD |
67 |
communities as a whole. |
68 |
|
69 |
I understand the ambivalence of many on this issue. Gentoo and all other |
70 |
distributions are global, and the Internet is global. I used to share this |
71 |
sense that no one law could curtail the freedom of this wonderful system we |
72 |
have. That is until I actually started researching these bills, and their |
73 |
sponsors - they, too are global - the are mega-weathy and they want to control |
74 |
the Internet. |
75 |
|
76 |
Chris |
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
--- |
80 |
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. |
81 |
Virus Database (VPS): 120119-1, 01/19/2012 |
82 |
Tested on: 1/19/2012 11:48:40 AM |
83 |
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2012 AVAST Software. |
84 |
http://www.avast.com |