1 |
On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v_2e@×××.net wrote: |
2 |
> Hello! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> From what I know for sure, many people in different countries |
5 |
> supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that |
6 |
> this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can easily be |
7 |
> repeated anywhere. And the point of opposing the US government |
8 |
> decisions for people in other countries, to my mind, is to state there |
9 |
> point of view *before* their local government try to do the same. And |
10 |
> that's important. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Regards, |
13 |
> Vladimir |
14 |
> |
15 |
> ----- |
16 |
> <v_2e@×××.net> |
17 |
|
18 |
There are also points that: |
19 |
1. These bills go way beyond filtering to a mandate to for Internet backbone |
20 |
providers block entire domains on the basis of one complaint of IP infringement |
21 |
- no evidence need be provided and there is no hearing. This would have an |
22 |
effect on the Internet, as a whole, since much Internet traffic goes through |
23 |
the US infrastructure. |
24 |
|
25 |
2. These bills criminalize something that no other country I am aware of has |
26 |
criminalized - IP (Copyright, Patent, and Trademark) infringement. It would |
27 |
become a 5 year felony to "violate" this law. |
28 |
|
29 |
3. The US is well known for its efforts to apply US law to the citizens of |
30 |
other countries - in fact, they are already doing this the a student from the |
31 |
United Kingdom. The US has demanded the extradition of this non-US citizen to |
32 |
face criminal charges in the US, for something that is NOT unlawful in the U.K. |
33 |
It also eliminates the US Copyright tradition of "fair use". |
34 |
|
35 |
I urge you to watch the Youtube video that I linked to, and to visit those |
36 |
sites. The more people who become aware of the truth of these bills, their |
37 |
sponsors, and the danger to not only US citizens, but also to citizens of any |
38 |
country that has an extradition treaty with the US, the better. |
39 |
|
40 |
There is another issue that would threaten the existence of Gentoo, Debian, and |
41 |
basically any GNU/Linux or *BSD distribution. Most distros I have seen include |
42 |
LAME, either as source (in the case of Gentoo) or in binary form. Well, guess |
43 |
what. The mp3 encoder algorithms that LAME uses are heavily patent encumbered. |
44 |
This means that one complaint by the patent holders and Gentoo or any other |
45 |
distro that includes LAME (yes, even only as source code), could result in ALL |
46 |
Internet providers in the US being required to actively block the entire domain |
47 |
for the distro, and ALL of its mirrors (which include many Universities and |
48 |
some of them would take preemptive action and stop mirroring all distros lest |
49 |
they be effectively shut down, especially if they are US-based). There are |
50 |
other patent encumbered packages in most distros, and any of them could result |
51 |
in a total block of them and their mirrors if a complaint is issued. |
52 |
|
53 |
This is why I was so shocked that the GNU/Linux and *BSD communities have not |
54 |
been more active in opposing these bills. The definition of infringement is so |
55 |
broad that it could and would be easily abused by the profiteers of the US that |
56 |
support them (actually, most of the supporters are multinational corporations). |
57 |
This threatens the whole of what the Internet has stood for since its very |
58 |
beginnings. |
59 |
|
60 |
Off my soap box, so to speak, |
61 |
Chris |
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
--- |
65 |
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. |
66 |
Virus Database (VPS): 120118-1, 01/18/2012 |
67 |
Tested on: 1/19/2012 5:29:28 AM |
68 |
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2012 AVAST Software. |
69 |
http://www.avast.com |