Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time?
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:33:00
Message-Id: i38d41$oh8$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? by sebasmagri@gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Sebasti=C3=A1n_Ram=C3=ADrez_Magr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=AD?=)
1 On 08/03/2010 08:03 AM, Sebastián Ramírez Magrí wrote:
2 >
3 > Hi folks...
4 >
5 > I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git
6 > based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in
7 > order to save bandwidth (I've a slow GSM connection in my netbook and
8 > I sync two other gentoo boxes from the first one) and maybe time.
9 >
10 > So here goes the question, Is a git based tree really going to save me
11 > an appreciable bandwidth and time on syncing?, Can I keep the same
12 > replication functionality rsync gives me to sync my other boxes?
13 >
14 > [0] http://github.com/funtoo/portage/tree/gentoo.org
15
16 Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers
17 differences, not whole files.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de>