1 |
On 2013-08-11 12:03 PM, Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> When in doubt, read the man page (make.conf(5)): |
3 |
> |
4 |
> "[...] |
5 |
> DESCRIPTION |
6 |
> This file contains various variables that are used by Portage. Portage will check |
7 |
> the currently-defined environment variables first for any settings. If no environ‐ |
8 |
> ment settings are found, Portage then checks the make.conf files. Both |
9 |
> /etc/make.conf and /etc/portage/make.conf are checked (if present), and settings |
10 |
> from /etc/portage/make.conf will override settings from /etc/make.conf. [...]" |
11 |
|
12 |
Thanks... my point was more that the news item didn't explain this - |
13 |
also, this answers as to make.conf, but what about make.profile? |
14 |
|
15 |
I just don't like being forced to assume, or 'test for myself', when it |
16 |
could be made crystal clear in the news item/docs. |
17 |
|
18 |
Also, would |
19 |
|
20 |
~ cd /etc/portage |
21 |
~ ln -s make.profile ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0 |
22 |
|
23 |
Be the right way to create the make.profile symlink in the new location? |
24 |
|
25 |
Not sure why the two preceeding dots are there in the current one in |
26 |
/etc, but they are... |
27 |
|
28 |
On 2013-08-11 12:16 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
29 |
> My question is why do you have files in both locations? |
30 |
|
31 |
I don't... I was getting ready to change these, and was just asking the |
32 |
question... ;) |