1 |
Hal Martin <hal.martin <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> Michael Schmarck wrote: |
5 |
> > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even attempt |
9 |
> >> to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same problem |
10 |
> >> before, as you have not provided any configuration at all and very |
11 |
> >> little useful information. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > What would you have wanted to see? I wrote that sound works. You |
15 |
> > don't need more information. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> >> Hence your post was as much noise as mine |
19 |
> >> was. |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > That's why other people, or at least Andrey, was able to help, where as |
23 |
> > you were just a moron. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> Not to dig up this unpleasantness again, but there are some things I'd |
26 |
> like to point out for future reference (for all people, including me, |
27 |
> who will post questions with hopes of getting useful answers.) |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> >> Nonetheless I shall try, so please provide the following: |
30 |
> >> |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > How nice from you, now that the problem has been solved. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> Yes, I'm aware that this particular problem has been solved, however I'd |
35 |
> still like to highlight a few things about it. |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> >> 1. the output of lspci as it relates to audio so we can see what |
38 |
> >> hardware you have |
39 |
> >> |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > Why should that matter? After all, sound playback works (in other |
42 |
> > programs). |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> It doesn't matter, but it's information people care about. |
45 |
|
46 |
Fine. Do you also care about the size of my shoes? It's a german |
47 |
46 - and yes, I *do* think, that it is just as important. :) |
48 |
|
49 |
> It helps us |
50 |
> to do our voodoo stuff and get back to you with an answer (it's quantity |
51 |
> over quality at this point of the answering stage.) |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> >> 2. What engine does rhythmbox use? gstreamer? If so, do other gstreamer |
54 |
> >> apps work correctly on your box? |
55 |
> >> |
56 |
> > |
57 |
> > That was the million dollar question. |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> Great, and now you've noticed that Totem, another GStreamer program, |
60 |
> isn't outputting sound. Therefore, instead of just blowing off the |
61 |
> previous poster, you could actually include that information. |
62 |
|
63 |
You mean Alan? He hasn't been helpful at all. I don't see, why such |
64 |
people should not be blown off. |
65 |
|
66 |
First he tried to be "funny" with his snide KDE remark. Then he |
67 |
wrote non-helpful (and as it turned out: wrong) comments about |
68 |
some non-existant circular dependencies. And he also failed to |
69 |
correctly read the gst-plugins-meta ebuild. No, he was not helpful |
70 |
at all. |
71 |
|
72 |
> > |
73 |
> >> 3. With what options did you compile rhythmbox and gstreamer (if |
74 |
> >> applicable)? |
75 |
> >> |
76 |
> > |
77 |
> > Does not matter. |
78 |
> > |
79 |
> Actually, it does. |
80 |
|
81 |
No, it does not. It doesn't have any USE flags that would matter |
82 |
there. |
83 |
|
84 |
Anyway, it's been compiled with these flags: |
85 |
|
86 |
[ebuild R ] media-sound/rhythmbox-0.11.2-r1 USE="-daap dbus -debug -doc |
87 |
-flac hal -ipod -keyring libnotify -lirc mad -musicbrainz python tagwriting |
88 |
vorbis" 3,454 kB |
89 |
|
90 |
No, there's no important information. As I said, rb was able to play |
91 |
the file. There just wasn't any sound. |
92 |
|
93 |
> Contrary to your belief that programs have the |
94 |
> ability to read your mind |
95 |
|
96 |
Just don't assume that I'm doing that, just because you're so naive. |
97 |
|
98 |
> and compile with all the flags they need to |
99 |
> function in every foreseeable way, real world applications need flags. |
100 |
|
101 |
Oh, really? Tell news! But you know what, rb doesn't need any additional |
102 |
flags. And you already knew that. |
103 |
|
104 |
> Posting them with your question allows for the quantity of answers to go |
105 |
> down, while the quality of the remaining ones to improve greatly. |
106 |
> Knowing from the beginning that you compiled GStreamer with -oss but not |
107 |
> alsa would've helped greatly. |
108 |
|
109 |
What? I have alsa set. And -oss. But this information was not necessary, |
110 |
because the problem was caused by the "bug" that rb used to depend on |
111 |
gst-plugins-base and that -base used to have alsa/oss/what-not use flags. |
112 |
That's no longer the case. Instead applications now need to depend on |
113 |
gst-plugins-meta - and that's the case with rhythmbox of Gnome 2.22. |
114 |
|
115 |
> >> 4. Lastly, this is out on left field, please confirm that rhythmbox is |
116 |
> >> indeed using alsa and not oss |
117 |
> >> |
118 |
> > |
119 |
> > Question 2 covers that. |
120 |
> > |
121 |
> No, it doesn't. |
122 |
|
123 |
Yes, it does. |
124 |
|
125 |
> You just deferred your answer instead of actually |
126 |
> confirming that the rhythmbox *engine* used either ALSA or OSS. |
127 |
|
128 |
Because it doesn't matter. rb uses gst. gst may use either engine. |
129 |
No engine was installed. Reason: Missing dependencies (but that's |
130 |
rectified in rhythmbox 2.22, per what Marduk wrote). |
131 |
|
132 |
> > Michael |
133 |
> > |
134 |
> > |
135 |
> Not trying to start a flame war between anywhere here, but I'm just |
136 |
> trying to make a point. Posting information, no matter how useless it |
137 |
> may seem to you, helps us help you. For example, |
138 |
|
139 |
No, that's not good. Only relevant information should be posted. |
140 |
It's no good to "flood" people (or "supporters") with unrelated |
141 |
and not important information. Instead, it's good to only send |
142 |
important information. |
143 |
|
144 |
> Again, not trying to restart any disagreements previously stemming from |
145 |
> this topic, I'm just trying to establish a clear method for reporting |
146 |
> problems so that we cut out all the "guess work" on the part of the |
147 |
> person answering the question. |
148 |
|
149 |
I posted all the relevant information. So I really don't see what |
150 |
you're trying to get at. And as it turned out, the problem I reported |
151 |
was just because I did not have gst-plugins-alsa (or -oss) installed, |
152 |
which was because gst-plugins-base no longer installs that. I indicated |
153 |
that I'm using ~x86, so you knew what versions I'm using (the latest, |
154 |
of course - if not, I would've of course said so). |
155 |
|
156 |
Michael |
157 |
|
158 |
-- |
159 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |