| 1 |
I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Now let's rebuild toolchain and then world so we will make use of the new |
| 4 |
compiler. |
| 5 |
Code Listing 2.2: Rebuilding system |
| 6 |
# emerge -eav system |
| 7 |
# emerge -eav world |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
and glibc is part of the system. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Which part of the upgrade guide did you not follw? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>And it said, that 4.1.1 was supposed to be binary compatible to 3.4.6. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
it did not say so some weeks ago, and it does not say so today. Or whenever |
| 17 |
else I looked at that document. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>> in such cases a rebuild of the affected packages |
| 20 |
>>(or even whole toolchain and system) might be required. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>And thus, a rebuild of world/tc/system wouldn't be required. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
wrong., read again. It says 'that a rebuild of system (which is a rebuild of |
| 25 |
the toolchain), might be required. And experience tells, that it IS required. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You behave like someone who never experienced a gcc-update. How long are you |
| 28 |
using gentoo? 4 weeks? 6 month? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
>Where was there a Qt update? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
like the qt3.3.0 to 3.3.2 or 3.3.3 or 3.3.4 updates? or 3.2 to 3.3? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
>No, it doesn't. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
yes it does. A lot of times. Sometimes even a qt -rX update forces a kdelibs |
| 37 |
recompile. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
>>> Did you try to compile glib? No? Then I guess you've done no testing. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
>>if he does not have glib? |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
>Then he installs it. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
so, he should install something he does not need and 'test' it, to satisfy |
| 47 |
your needs? Why should he? If you want glib tested, do it yourself. Or are |
| 48 |
you too grand and important? Why should anybody test something FOR YOU? |
| 49 |
Or are you complaining, that his tests does not cover YOUR needs? |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
NEWSFLASH: this is gentoo, everybody has a slightly different system. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
>And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements |
| 55 |
>which turn out to be wrong. If it says "no problems expected", then |
| 56 |
t>>at's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And |
| 57 |
>the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated, that there were no problems |
| 58 |
>to be expected. |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
No, it did not. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
It said: |
| 64 |
The number of applications that do not compile with gcc-4.1 is extremely |
| 65 |
small now, and most users should not experience any problems with ~arch |
| 66 |
packages not compiling. |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
see? 'most users' and '~arch packages' |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
And not 'everything that Alexander Skwar, the superduper user everybody loves, |
| 71 |
and whose system is THE pinnacle of how a gentoo system should look like, has |
| 72 |
installed, will work flawlessly.' |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
You are just sulking around, and it becomes less and less funny. |
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
>I deal with them just fine. |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
so why are you doing this 'Zwergenaufstand'? |
| 80 |
-- |
| 81 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives