Archives
Archives
| From: | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] why zfs and friends want to update to 9999? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:26:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20171011202620.GA23771@waltdnes.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] why zfs and friends want to update to 9999? by John Covici |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 05:34:48AM -0400, John Covici wrote |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Yep, I think you are correct, I had the 9999 in package.keywords and |
| 4 | > I think this is what made portage do that. When I commented them out, |
| 5 | > things are back to normal. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Maybe portage inserted that entry itself. If you want to prevent that |
| 8 | in future, add the following line to make.conf ... |
| 9 | |
| 10 | EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask=n" |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 14 | I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] why zfs and friends want to update to 9999? | John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] why zfs and friends want to update to 9999? | "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> |