1 |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 04:50:20 -0400, |
2 |
J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:54:05 AM CEST John Covici wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi. In my latest world update, I have sys-fs/zfs and friends at |
6 |
> > 0.7.1 and they all want to update to 9999. Does anyone know why this |
7 |
> > should be -- normally 9999 is not in the normal update sequence. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I am using the unstable gentoo, updated about 3 weeks ago. No harm |
10 |
> > has come yet, but I have not done the update till I can figure out |
11 |
> > what is happening here -- particularly if I need a rescue cd which is |
12 |
> > using zfs 0.7.1. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Thanks in advance for any ideas. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> check your keywords, how did you unmask zfs? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Here are mine: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> $ grep -r zfs /etc/portage |
21 |
> /etc/portage/sets/zfs:sys-fs/zfs |
22 |
> /etc/portage/sets/zfs:sys-fs/zfs-kmod |
23 |
> /etc/portage/package.keywords/zfs:=sys-fs/zfs-kmod-0.7.1 ~amd64 |
24 |
> /etc/portage/package.keywords/zfs:=sys-fs/zfs-0.7.1 ~amd64 |
25 |
> $ grep -r spl /etc/portage |
26 |
> /etc/portage/sets/zfs:sys-kernel/spl |
27 |
> /etc/portage/package.keywords/zfs:=sys-kernel/spl-0.7.1 ~amd64 |
28 |
|
29 |
Yep, I think you are correct, I had the 9999 in package.keywords and I |
30 |
think this is what made portage do that. |
31 |
When I commented them out, things are back to normal. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks again. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
37 |
How do |
38 |
you spend it? |
39 |
|
40 |
John Covici |
41 |
covici@××××××××××.com |