From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | ||
Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:28:41 | ||
Message-Id: | 201304032328.20923.michaelkintzios@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes by Bruce Hill |
1 | On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of |
4 | > those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did |
5 | > manually. |
6 | |
7 | Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev scripts. With udev-200 you are |
8 | meant to remove it along with any other files from your /etc/udev/rules.d/ |
9 | |
10 | If you left them there and their syntax is still valid, then udev will parse |
11 | them and do as is told. |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Regards, |
15 | Mick |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |