| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of |
| 5 |
> > those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did |
| 6 |
> > manually. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev scripts. With udev-200 you are |
| 9 |
> meant to remove it along with any other files from your /etc/udev/rules.d/ |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If you left them there and their syntax is still valid, then udev will parse |
| 12 |
> them and do as is told. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> Regards, |
| 16 |
> Mick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Why are we "meant to remove it"? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Why would we remove them, since they're working? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
My kernel(s) all have eth* and none of that weirdness others reported. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Bruce |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
| 28 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
| 29 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
| 30 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
| 31 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
| 32 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 35 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 36 |
A: Top-posting. |
| 37 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |
Archives