| 1 |
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:22:11 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> Do you really want to put /home on a SSD? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Why not? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > /home is the most frequently-read directory on most systems, and SSD |
| 8 |
> > is ideal for that. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > If you are concerned about wear-levelling, /home is not the danger |
| 11 |
> > point |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Interesting. I'm not sure I would want mine on a SSD even if it would |
| 14 |
> fit on one. The only part that might help would be my .kde |
| 15 |
> and .mozilla directory. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
SSDs are not like USB flash drives, and it's been years since I managed |
| 18 |
to wear one of those out (mainly due to a kernel bug). They have |
| 19 |
lifetimes similar to spinny disks these days. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If you got the words it does not mean you got the knowledge. |
Archives