1 |
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Grant wrote: |
2 |
> > > > On a notebook, there isn't an OS in existence that is immune |
3 |
> > > > to a LiveCD. |
4 |
> > > |
5 |
> > > Linux is. In the sense that you can't get at the data if the |
6 |
> > > disc is encrypted, even not with a LiveCD. You can only |
7 |
> > > destroy/overwrite it. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Yes, I realised that when typing the original, but left it as is |
10 |
> > - too many IF conditionals would be needed to be accurate and |
11 |
> > English is almost useless at getting IFs to parse correctly :-) |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Passwords come from a time when users had terminals that log |
14 |
> > onto machines that are somewhere else and the user can't lay a |
15 |
> > finger on them. Things have indeed changed since 1978 |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Would the type of filesystem encryption you guys are talking about |
18 |
> be unsuitable for a high-traffic server because of performance |
19 |
> considerations? |
20 |
|
21 |
Yes, and it isn't necessary. You lock your servers away so that nobody |
22 |
has physical access to them. |
23 |
|
24 |
It's only interesting for workstations, laptops and external storage |
25 |
devices. |
26 |
|
27 |
Uwe |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Informal Linux Group Namibia: |
31 |
http://www.linux.org.na/ |
32 |
SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: |
33 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na/ |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |