| 1 |
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 22 May 2015 23:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that |
| 6 |
>>> way I know which config goes with which kernel. Everyone has their own |
| 7 |
>>> way of doing what works for them. I just prefer to copy my own manually |
| 8 |
>>> with a name that makes sense to me. I don't think make install will do |
| 9 |
>>> this the way I do it. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> make install does it exactly the way you are doing it, but faster and |
| 12 |
>> less prone to error. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Hmm ... I may have used it the wrong way quite a few years ago, but it would |
| 15 |
> only keep two kernels at a time or something like that. That made me carry on |
| 16 |
> copying kernel files into boot manually. In this way at least I know where I |
| 17 |
> put them and what options I pass on to them. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Two same-version kernels at a time? That's true because of |
| 20 |
"/sbin/installkernel". |
Archives