1 |
Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I have a question. I'm using KDE4, about to switch to 4.5.2. Do I need |
7 |
>> qt3support anymore? I'm talking about the USE flag qt3support. I run into |
8 |
>> blocks sometimes and I know KDE3 needed qt3. I'm just curious if I can get |
9 |
>> rid of this USE flag now. I only have KDE4 installed. No more KDE3 left |
10 |
>> that I know of. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> Going along with what Alan said. qt3support does not use Qt 3 at all. |
13 |
> It just puts something like a Qt 3-compatible API into Qt 4, to make |
14 |
> porting Qt 3 to Qt 4 apps easier. It is largely insignifcant to you |
15 |
> (since it's not pulling in qt3 packages). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If you have any packages that require this USE flag, their ebuild will |
18 |
> require this USE flag. So disable it, emerge --deep --newuse world and |
19 |
> see if it complains. If it does, re-enable and continue life with |
20 |
> qt3support as if nothing ever happened. :) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Just picking the last message to reply to so this is for everyone who |
25 |
has chimed in so far. |
26 |
|
27 |
I may remove the USE flag and just see what blows up. I may copy over |
28 |
some binaries so that I can just use -k and not have to wait on the |
29 |
compiles. I would think if I remove it that something would pitch all |
30 |
holy hell about it if it has to have it. I'm sure it would be caught at |
31 |
some point and I would know it then for sure. |
32 |
|
33 |
I'm not sure if I have anything on here that must have qt3support. Is |
34 |
there a way to know for sure? Maybe some obscure command that I am not |
35 |
familiar with? |
36 |
|
37 |
Dale |
38 |
|
39 |
:-) :-) |