| 1 |
Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dale writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Erik Hahn wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Quoting Erik Hahn <erik_hahn@×××.de>: |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem? |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time... |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>> So far, it works fine. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> +1 |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> If something works, why does it need to be updated? |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Active projects usually get updated to include new featuresm whatever they |
| 23 |
> may be. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I first used supermount as auto mounter. Then suddenly it disappeared and |
| 26 |
> was replaced by submount. Which behaved differently, I had to adapt my |
| 27 |
> scripts. submount then again got removed, I started using ivman, again I |
| 28 |
> had to change my scripts to adapt to different behaviour. Now I wonder |
| 29 |
> what will come next and in which way it will differ. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Wonko |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I used to use supermount too. Switching for me was pretty easy tho. I |
| 38 |
had some compatibility issues between versions of hal and ivman once but |
| 39 |
nothing really major, just annoying as usual. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I guess I'm one of those, if it works, just use it. Ivman works for me |
| 42 |
but if something better comes along and is stable, then that would be |
| 43 |
cool too. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Dale |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
:-) :-) |
Archives