Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:20:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070222181249.2747284e@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? by "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:08:23 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I am fairly certain I was still using my custom initrd (not an |
| 4 | > initramfs) until 2.6.17 -- I'm fairly sure 2.6.20 still *supports* |
| 5 | > initrd format, even if initramfs is preferred now. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It does, I have a system that boots 2.6.20 using an initrd. It works fine |
| 8 | and I don't feel inclined to get involved in initramfs voodoo just to |
| 9 | change an already working system |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Neil Bothwick |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Don't let the computer bugs bite! |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? | Dirk Heinrichs <ext-dirk.heinrichs@×××××.com> |