| 1 |
Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> [12-08-06 17:36]: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, <meino.cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I am asking, because I found not only one description of somehow |
| 6 |
> > complicated setups to compile a distribution (namely gentoo) for a |
| 7 |
> > platform "A" (Beaglebone TI OMAP4) on that platform with distcc to |
| 8 |
> > speedup things or with emulated chroot environments based on qemu... |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I thought it would be the easiest to compile the whole stuff on a host |
| 11 |
> > system "B" with a crosscompilation toolchain...but may be I have |
| 12 |
> > overlooked something important... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Seems the best way to me, too. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > So - is there any logical reason, which prevents the process of the |
| 17 |
> > compilation of a complete distribution/rootfs/boot-mechanism for |
| 18 |
> > a platform "A" on a hostsystem of the platform "B" if the cross |
| 19 |
> > compilation toolchain is already installed on "B" and no emulated |
| 20 |
> > environment is wanted? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> So you want to "install" the packages into a virtual filesystem image |
| 23 |
> on the compiler machine to create a whole disk image for the target, |
| 24 |
> basically? Hmmm. Maybe something like Scratchbox can help with this. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
Hi Paul, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
...yes, exactly. But theproblem remains...is there a logical reason, |
| 29 |
which renders this attempt useless ? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
mcc |
Archives