1 |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
2 |
> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> emerge -e world |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> It shouldn't do any harm. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>>> I do not mind taking this machine offline for the few days of the |
13 |
>>> emerge. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> There's no need for that, just set PORTAGE_NICENESS=19 in make.conf. You |
16 |
>> may want to run emerge -ef world first to make sure all files you need |
17 |
>> are in $DISTDIR. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> thanks, |
20 |
> allan |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Hi Allan, |
24 |
I admit to being a bit confused at this point. You ran the |
25 |
lafilefixer suggestion and said it fixed things. Did that step |
26 |
actually fix your libssl problem? |
27 |
|
28 |
I guess you also ran fsck as it's a good thing to do once in awhile |
29 |
anyway. That's cool. |
30 |
|
31 |
It seems, however, that you're still going down the path of emerge |
32 |
-e @world. Why is that? If it's just to be confident that everything |
33 |
is back to the way it should be then I understand that. I've done it |
34 |
myself many times in the last 12 years. |
35 |
|
36 |
Just trying to get a handle on what the actual solution is vs all |
37 |
the other things going on in the thread! :-) |
38 |
|
39 |
Thanks, |
40 |
Mark |