| 1 |
Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:26 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> So is it now an appropriate time for me to run an |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> emerge -e world |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> It shouldn't do any harm. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> I do not mind taking this machine offline for the few days of the |
| 15 |
>>>> emerge. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> There's no need for that, just set PORTAGE_NICENESS=19 in make.conf. You |
| 18 |
>>> may want to run emerge -ef world first to make sure all files you need |
| 19 |
>>> are in $DISTDIR. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> thanks, |
| 22 |
>> allan |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Hi Allan, |
| 26 |
> I admit to being a bit confused at this point. You ran the |
| 27 |
> lafilefixer suggestion and said it fixed things. Did that step |
| 28 |
> actually fix your libssl problem? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I "fixed" that problem by copying over the missing files from another |
| 31 |
system. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> I guess you also ran fsck as it's a good thing to do once in awhile |
| 34 |
> anyway. That's cool. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> It seems, however, that you're still going down the path of emerge |
| 37 |
> -e @world. Why is that? If it's just to be confident that everything |
| 38 |
> is back to the way it should be then I understand that. I've done it |
| 39 |
> myself many times in the last 12 years. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Yes that is the reason. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
> Just trying to get a handle on what the actual solution is vs all |
| 44 |
> the other things going on in the thread! :-) |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Thanks for the concern and help. |
| 47 |
allan |
Archives