1 |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:24:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> > |
3 |
> > Doesn't a good cloud server also have potentially higher availability |
4 |
> > compared to dedicated? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Potentially? Yes. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> In reality? No. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It's not the virtualization that breaks, it's all the surrounding |
11 |
> infrastructure, especially Layer 2. You will not believe how fragile |
12 |
> that stuff can get. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> In the old days, a small slip up could isolate a small part of the |
15 |
> network. These days, a small slip-up easily ripples though the entire |
16 |
> network and takes down all of it, and sadly this is not rare. The |
17 |
> networking needs of VMs are radically different from the traditional, |
18 |
> and this is the side-effect: fragility. |
19 |
|
20 |
And it happens *every* day, all over the place. |
21 |
|
22 |
Yesterday I went to Coburn's Supply to get a box of air filters for our HVAC |
23 |
units. They "couldn't get in". One guy says, "I'm on the internet, don't know |
24 |
what's wrong". The other guy says, "It's _them_ ..." So they couldn't even |
25 |
tell me the price of the filters, or if they had them. So one guy walks in the |
26 |
back and does it the "old fashioned way" -- he just looks. (Reminds me a bit |
27 |
of sneakernet.) By the time he gets back, and tries again, "Hey, it's working |
28 |
now ... quick!" |
29 |
|
30 |
Welcome to the cloud. Your packet has reached critical mass. Please reboot. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
33 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
34 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
35 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
36 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
37 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
38 |
|
39 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |