| 1 |
· Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 4 |
>> · Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> Is it legal to do the following: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> 1) "emerge vmware-workstation" |
| 10 |
>>> 2) build some images (within the 30 day trial period) |
| 11 |
>>> 3) "emerge -C vmware-workstation" (within the 30 day trial period) |
| 12 |
>>> 4) "emerge vmware-player" and use it to play the images created by |
| 13 |
>>> vmware-workstation |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> That might be legal, but why don't you go the absolutely legal |
| 17 |
>> way and use vmware-server instead of vmware-workstation? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Alexander Skwar |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I have no strong reason for choosing vmw-workstation. There are two |
| 23 |
> minor things that make me prefer it: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> - I am familiar with vmw-workstation and I've never seen vmw-server |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
There's no difference (as far as the interface is concerned). |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> - VMW-Server is beta version |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
It is not. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> and masked as testing package |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
That might be. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
If God hadn't wanted you to be paranoid, He wouldn't have given you such |
| 40 |
a vivid imagination. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives