| 1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
> · Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Is it legal to do the following: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> 1) "emerge vmware-workstation" |
| 8 |
>> 2) build some images (within the 30 day trial period) |
| 9 |
>> 3) "emerge -C vmware-workstation" (within the 30 day trial period) |
| 10 |
>> 4) "emerge vmware-player" and use it to play the images created by |
| 11 |
>> vmware-workstation |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That might be legal, but why don't you go the absolutely legal |
| 15 |
> way and use vmware-server instead of vmware-workstation? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Alexander Skwar |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I have no strong reason for choosing vmw-workstation. There are two |
| 21 |
minor things that make me prefer it: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- I am familiar with vmw-workstation and I've never seen vmw-server |
| 24 |
- VMW-Server is beta version and masked as testing package |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If there were any legal issues with vmw-workstation I would use |
| 28 |
vmw-server or try the site pointed by Mr. Raymond Lewis Rebbeck: |
| 29 |
http://www.easyvmx.com/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Best regards, |
| 34 |
Daniel |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives