| 1 |
Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't play games, but I've long had my desktop box using HZ_1000 |
| 3 |
> & it has always been very responsive (now Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.6.23-r3). |
| 4 |
> That's certainly the first thing to try. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I use 100 Hz on an old P3 desktop/server. It's not a high traffic |
| 7 |
server, but it does my web/email/taking over the world. The desktop |
| 8 |
environment can be pretty sluggish at times, but I keep it at 100 just |
| 9 |
for efficiency. Would I be best off to up the interrupt rate, or would |
| 10 |
that hurt my serverness on my aging system? The desktop sluggishness is |
| 11 |
livable, but I wouldn't want any tcp connections to time out from not |
| 12 |
being serviced (how long is a typical timeout anyhow?) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Randy Barlow |
| 16 |
http://electronsweatshop.com |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives