1 |
071214 Shawn Haggett wrote: |
2 |
>> CONFIG_HZ_100=y |
3 |
>> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set |
4 |
>> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set |
5 |
>> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set |
6 |
>> CONFIG_HZ=100 |
7 |
> Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second. |
8 |
> ie the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching between processes, |
9 |
> but also a process will have to wait longer |
10 |
> if another is currently using the CPU. |
11 |
> Higher numbers tend to be good for getting faster responses, |
12 |
> since the process on average shouldn't have to wait as long |
13 |
> to actually get back on the CPU. |
14 |
> 1000Hz for a really low latency desktop machine. |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't play games, but I've long had my desktop box using HZ_1000 |
17 |
& it has always been very responsive (now Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.6.23-r3). |
18 |
That's certainly the first thing to try. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
========================,,============================================ |
22 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@××××××××××××××.ca |
23 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies |
24 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto |
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |