| 1 |
I think you all understood me wrong: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
LK wrote <linuxrocksrulers@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Arch Linux there is a variable with all important things to |
| 6 |
> be run, like dhcpcd, ssh, apache, and so on. If I want i can |
| 7 |
> simply prepend a '@' to be begin to start it in the background. |
| 8 |
> I miss that ease on gentoo. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I mean, rc-update adds a service in such a way, that the |
| 12 |
booting waits for that service to complete startup. Now I would |
| 13 |
like to start the service in the background to speed the boot up. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I was able to do this kind of stuff in arch: |
| 16 |
SERVICES="udev nxserver @dhcpcd @ssh" |
| 17 |
Where the services preceeded by a AT are backgroundified. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
TIA... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> wrote: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:50:34AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> > If you emerge ifplugd it should automatically let network start |
| 26 |
> > immediately at boot, and then do the actual connection in the |
| 27 |
> > background. It also handles unplug/plugging of the cable without you |
| 28 |
> > needing to do anything. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I started a reply naming ifplugd, but then discarded it again in fear I was |
| 31 |
> unable to explain the technical background of what it actually does. :o) |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> I've been using ifplugd for years, but a while ago switched to netplug for |
| 34 |
> no |
| 35 |
> concrete reason. Do you by any chance know the difference between the two? |
| 36 |
> All I know is that they do basically the same and both their distfile is |
| 37 |
> only |
| 38 |
> a few kB in size. Even their package description is the same. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
What the heck are you even talking about? I am sorry to have explained it |
| 41 |
wrong. |
Archives