| 1 |
On 01/16/13 06:31, Mike Edenfield wrote: |
| 2 |
>> On 13 January 2013, at 06:53, Andrew Lowe wrote: |
| 3 |
>> ... |
| 4 |
>> From all of the above, I think the important part is that I need to |
| 5 |
>> install some "glibc developement files". A google search doesn't point me |
| 6 |
> in |
| 7 |
>> the direction of what these might be. According to "eix glibc", I have |
| 8 |
> debug |
| 9 |
>> turned OFF - is this the problem? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The part about the "glibc development [sic] files" is mostly a red herring. |
| 12 |
> I'm not sure where it's coming from (I can't find that misspelling of |
| 13 |
> development in the portage source or any eclass, and it's not part of the |
| 14 |
> actual ebuild.) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
[snip] |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I got an email directly from the maintainer pointing me to something in |
| 21 |
the gentoo bugs db, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444020#c6 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
which basically says there was something wrong and re-emerging glibc |
| 26 |
will fix the problem. I did this then ran my "emerge -NuD world". Lo & |
| 27 |
behold, V5 of the compiler was installed, not the V4.?? that I was |
| 28 |
having trouble with, and installed cleanly. As V5 is now there, I can't |
| 29 |
be bothered checking on the V4 problem. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks for the comments, |
| 32 |
Andrew |
Archives