| 1 |
Am Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:38:45PM -0600 schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I suspect it has something to do with this being a older system. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Very likely. :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I wouldn't be surprised if the SATA was a older and slower version. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I hate to repeat myself, but no. Here are the speeds of SATA: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Generation Year Gross bandwidth Net bandwidth |
| 12 |
--------------------------------------------------------- |
| 13 |
SATA 1 2003 1.5 Gbps 1.2 Gbps (150 MB/s) |
| 14 |
SATA 2 2004 3.0 Gbps 2.4 Gbps (300 MB/s) |
| 15 |
SATA 3 2008 6.0 Gbps 4.8 Gbps (600 MB/s) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Even SATA 1 is faster than your new ethernet card. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> I guess I could google it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
My source (as most often): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA |
| 22 |
If you know the name of a technical thing, the quickest way to concise |
| 23 |
facts is wikipedia. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ |
| 27 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
The stupid keep tidy. The genius controls chaos. |
Archives