1 |
Michael wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday, 18 December 2022 15:12:37 GMT Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Mark Knecht wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 4:42 PM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
5 |
>>> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> wrote: |
6 |
>>> <SNIP> |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> My reasoning is simple, I'm already familiar with LVM and how to |
9 |
>>> manage it. |
10 |
>>> <SNIP> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Take the machine, wipe it and build a NAS from scratch with Gentoo. If |
13 |
>>> all you want is an NFS mount that won't be difficult. Add an NFS |
14 |
>>> server, export your mount and you're done, right? Managing it over the |
15 |
>>> long term will be far more work than TrueNAS but you will be |
16 |
>>> comfortable with changing disks and adding network cards which |
17 |
>>> is important to you. Life is too short to deal with things you really |
18 |
>>> don't enjoy. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> I would not suggest you look at Ubuntu Server because it's NGL. 10 |
21 |
>>> minutes to install, 3 minutes to figure out how to add the NFS server. |
22 |
>>> However it's a different package manager and truly not as nice as |
23 |
>>> emerge/portage so you probably won't like that part of NGL either. I |
24 |
>>> truly don't like apt, but it works if I stay in my lane so I've |
25 |
>>> learned to do that, the advantage being I've never had to build a |
26 |
>>> package from scratch and I've never in 5 or 6 years had an update fail. |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> Wipe the machine. You'll be happier. |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>>> Best wishes, |
31 |
>>> Mark |
32 |
>> Well, I finally got it so I could do a backup. I didn't need a hammer |
33 |
>> but the thought crossed my mind. lol Even tho I now have a 1GB network |
34 |
>> card, it's still really slow. It shows up as a 1GB connection on both |
35 |
>> my Gentoo machine and the NAS machine. This is a example of the speeds |
36 |
>> I'm seeing. Just snippets. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> 277,193,507 100% 16.18MB/s 0:00:16 |
40 |
>> 519,216,571 100% 18.86MB/s 0:00:26 |
41 |
>> 738,078,565 100% 23.54MB/s 0:00:29 |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> As you can see, the files sizes are large enough it should do better. |
45 |
>> When I use iftop, it shows it isn't doing anywhere near the speed it |
46 |
>> should, maybe 1/4th or so. I'd expect at least double or triple that |
47 |
>> speed. In all honesty, I'd think the hard drive would be the limiting |
48 |
>> factor. Even on my Gentoo rig I only get about 50 to 60MBs/sec for |
49 |
>> encrypted drives. I think the encryption slows that down. When copying |
50 |
>> from a plain drive to a plain drive, I get 100MBs/sec or so. |
51 |
>> |
52 |
>> I can't figure out why it is so slow tho. The NAS rig is a 4 core CPU |
53 |
>> and 8GBs of memory. It should have enough horsepower under the hood. |
54 |
>> Maybe it is something I'm not aware of. It is a older rig so maybe it |
55 |
>> isn't SATA's fastest version, maybe even the original or something. I |
56 |
>> can't find anything in lspci or dmesg so not real sure where to look on |
57 |
>> BSD. |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> Anyway, it's progress for now at least. ;-) At this rate, it'll be |
60 |
>> done in about a week, maybe. o_O |
61 |
>> |
62 |
>> Dale |
63 |
>> |
64 |
>> :-) :-) |
65 |
> Has it auto-negotiated a full-duplex connection at 1Gbps? Run ifconfig and |
66 |
> check the output, it should say something like: |
67 |
> |
68 |
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) |
69 |
> |
70 |
> If not, then you may need to set this up manually. |
71 |
|
72 |
Mine says that here too. |
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) |
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
You know, it's not that easy to copy that from a console on BSD. It was |
79 |
kind enough to give me a hint on how tho. ;-) |
80 |
|
81 |
I was pretty sure it was at full speed. In iftop it showed it was a 1GB |
82 |
connection, just not using much of it. |
83 |
|
84 |
I suspect it has something to do with this being a older system. I |
85 |
wouldn't be surprised if the SATA was a older and slower version. I |
86 |
guess I could google it. |
87 |
|
88 |
Dale |
89 |
|
90 |
:-) :-) |