Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake?
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:30:27
Message-Id: CAKpSnpLwaHOWtKkOuvAuYMzRpU-V6fLPspVUzdKng8y+pPLqXg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? by "Poison BL."
1 On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Poison BL. <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > While I don't have anything that new handy, the 6MB cache checks out against
6 > intel's specs for the i5-7600. The broadwell i5-5675 lists off at a 4MB
7 > cache (not including the eDRAM). GCC seems to like going with a slightly
8 > more tried & true feature set when faced with a fancy, new, chip, in my
9 > experience. Especially if the version of GCC in use isn't the absolute
10 > bleeding edge latest and greatest.
11 >
12
13 Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged
14 gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though.
15
16 Jorge

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com>