Archives
Archives
| From: | Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "gentoo-user@l.g.o" <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 22 Apr 2017 23:31:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAC=wYCHngP-XXK5TkK_J5=AtRzKw+LYvPPxZy6J8GwWuqS=keg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? by Jorge Almeida |
||
| 1 | > |
| 2 | > Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged |
| 3 | > gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4 |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a kabylake. |
| 9 | https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.3.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? | Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> |