Archives
Archives
| From: | Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 23 Apr 2017 07:19:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAKpSnp+oUtsp3JwLjNMMohFsNWHsSYNy29DYJ8yjwDuZp7kK2w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake? by Adam Carter |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | >> Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged |
| 3 | >> gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4 |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a kabylake. |
| 9 | > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.3.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | Thanks! |
| 12 | |
| 13 | <stress level coming down> |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Jorge |