| 1 |
Mike Kazantsev wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:36:55 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Since your ISP offers you the option to have two different IP, yes that |
| 6 |
>> the best choice. Over here I would have to pay quite some money to get |
| 7 |
>> an extra IP. So you're lucky I guess. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There is plenty of address space on IPv6. One can set up a tunnel, if |
| 10 |
> ISP doesn't provide it yet. |
| 11 |
> After that, it's as simple as enabling forwarding in kernel and opening |
| 12 |
> a FORWARD chain, and you can have 64+ bits of real addresses behind it, |
| 13 |
> no translation or port forwarding. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> And teredo (in form of miredo daemon) offers ability to access IPv6 |
| 16 |
> from anywhere (like public hotspots) w/o setting up any tunneling. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Of course, it's not much use for public server, but certainly useful |
| 19 |
> for ssh (among over things) to networks behind nat. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I can't say I understood what you said, but the majority of ISPs give |
| 22 |
clients v4 IPs? Mine for example right now (it's dynamic) is |
| 23 |
79.123.149.101. That's the only way to reach me from WAN. |
Archives