1 |
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:40:57 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> He isn't the first to make that observation. Many have pointed out |
5 |
>> that the testing branch today seems a lot like stable Gentoo used to |
6 |
>> be, and that we err too much on the side of not making big changes. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> However, I'm not sure that we really are afraid of breaking things so |
9 |
>> much that many of us have just grown comfortable with the way things |
10 |
>> have been done. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Also, in openrc Gentoo has an init system that is superior to those used |
13 |
> by other distros pre-systemd. Openrc has some of the benefits that |
14 |
> systemd offers other distros, like dependencies, so there is somewhat |
15 |
> less incentive to change. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I definitely agree here. |
19 |
|
20 |
We actually went through an rc change when we deployed openrc, and it |
21 |
worked fine. There were bugs not unlike what some run into with |
22 |
systemd - anytime you replace something old with something new you get |
23 |
regressions. We also really too our time with the switchover, which |
24 |
is something most distros don't seem to be doing with systemd (to |
25 |
their users's detriment - I think burning bridges gets encouraged by |
26 |
the politics to prevent backtracking). I think it took years between |
27 |
the ~arch and stable dates for baselayout-2 on Gentoo. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Rich |