1 |
The problem occurs when running Win4Lin *within* a VNC session. The same |
2 |
goes for QEMU. |
3 |
|
4 |
I don't fully understand the difference between loading X at the console |
5 |
versus loading it at a virtual console, but I think that some keyboard |
6 |
mappings (among other things) are treated differently in the virtual |
7 |
console. When I first started playing around with WTS, over a year ago, |
8 |
I was using XDMCP on the server and Cygwin/X on the client--I had the |
9 |
exact same problem... The number keypad didn't work. |
10 |
|
11 |
So it's probably just that X doesn't load everything at the virtual |
12 |
console that is does at the real console. |
13 |
|
14 |
Ron Bickers wrote: |
15 |
|
16 |
>On Thu January 26 2006 17:41, Tom Smith wrote: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
>>Sheesh, I finally found a solution to this very annoying problem (may |
21 |
>>also help the gentleman with the UK keyboard problem (Peter Ruskin?)... |
22 |
>>I actually discovered this while playing around with QEMU, it had the |
23 |
>>EXACT same problem as WTS. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>I just stopped using Win4Lin and started using QEMU (tired of kernel patching |
28 |
>and being so far behind gentoo-sources). The numlock key works fine in both |
29 |
>for me (sort of). The only thing wrong is that if it says it's on in the |
30 |
>Windows session, it's really off, and vice versa. The keypad numbers *do* |
31 |
>work as expected, though. Is there more to this problem that I'm missing? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |