Archives
Archives
| From: | Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <dystopianray@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter | ||
| Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:32:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200606032346.49063.dystopianray@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter by Allan Gottlieb |
||
| 1 | On Saturday, 3 June 2006 23:24, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
| 2 | > So this utmpter/libutmpter appears to be a special case where the |
| 3 | > normal |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > unmerge A |
| 6 | > merge B |
| 7 | > merge A |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > is wrong. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > thanks again, |
| 12 | > allan |
| 13 | |
| 14 | I don't believe the procedure you mentioned has ever been normal. If packages |
| 15 | block it usually indicates that a package is being replaced by another. An |
| 16 | example is how shadow recently replaced pam-login. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Raymond Lewis Rebbeck |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] utempter vs libutempter | Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> |