1 |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:48:07PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote |
3 |
>> Analogy: |
4 |
>> 99% of people aren't going to need a11y. But the whole point of |
5 |
>> installing it by default on most desktop systems is that you can't |
6 |
>> predict who will need it, |
7 |
>> and _it does not harm_ (or very little harm) > to the people who don't.> |
8 |
> [ list of pa horror anecdotes ] |
9 |
> And a Google search turns up a lot more cases. |
10 |
>> So your tradeoffs are: |
11 |
>> A) no a11y unless elected by user: |
12 |
>> - for the 1%: a11y is a pain to install |
13 |
> |
14 |
> How "painfull" is it to add "pulseaudio" to USE in make.conf and then |
15 |
> emerge --changed-use world |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
So how "painful" is it to not add pulseaudio to your USE flag? You're |
19 |
comparing a gentoo user's experience, where we willingly wade in stuff |
20 |
to fix, to, say, an gnobuntudora user's experience, where all of this |
21 |
is automatic and made to "just work"... I wouldn't be surprised if the |
22 |
horror stories had to do with configuring the damned thing. It's |
23 |
actually interesting how dated (read:solved) some of the lag issues |
24 |
are when I _do_ google them which is revealing.... |
25 |
|
26 |
>> because the user might not even be able to see the screen (very big pain) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Are you seriously arguing that a linux system will black-screen at |
29 |
> bootup due to lack of pulseaudio? |
30 |
|
31 |
See my previous message: no. I'm arguing that a very simplistic take |
32 |
on "more complexity = automatic bad" is misguided. |
33 |
|
34 |
> That is a strawman argument that avoids the question. This is *NOT* |
35 |
> about "a few megabytes" of disk space. It's about an extra layer on top |
36 |
> of the system, chewing up memory, slowing it down, and interacting with |
37 |
> other software to cause problems. *THAT* is what it's about. |
38 |
|
39 |
The "extra layer" that eats up so much memory (megabytes), slowdown |
40 |
(megabytes!), and software bogging (more megabytes!) that it's a |
41 |
wonder why anybody's desktop works as is. Oh wait. |
42 |
|
43 |
YES it is entirely about a few megabytes you don't like. A few |
44 |
megabytes that OTHER people choose to put on THEIR computers to NO |
45 |
effect on yours. Even your sig betrays your bias. |
46 |
|
47 |
> -- |
48 |
> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
49 |
> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social |
54 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
55 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |