| 1 |
On Thursday 22 July 2010 14:37:04 Mr. Jarry wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon |
| 3 |
<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> in |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > this day and age? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a |
| 11 |
> legitimate reason? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes it does. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Most extant sendmail users in my experience have it because "it came with the |
| 16 |
CD". Or they have a pointy haired boss who doesn't actually USE it, but |
| 17 |
insists that the staff do. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Such folk are much better off with an alternate. I just needed to know which |
| 20 |
camp you were in. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
[snip] |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Finally someone who does not suggest me to switch to other MTA! |
| 25 |
> btw, It is strange, there is a milter for SenderID (which iirc is in some |
| 26 |
> way |
| 27 |
> close to Microsoft) in portage tree, but nothing for openSPF. I will try to |
| 28 |
> make an ebuild. Maybe there are still more "real unix admins" using |
| 29 |
> old'n'good sendmail. But no flame over "which MTA is better", please. |
| 30 |
> (anyway, we all know Sendmail is the best! :-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Now you have your answer |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives