| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>wrote: |
| 2 |
> I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail |
| 3 |
in |
| 4 |
> this day and age? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a |
| 7 |
legitimate reason? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jason Carson <jason@×××××××××××.ca> wrote: |
| 11 |
> To enable SPF on outgoing mail all you have to do is create a SPF record |
| 12 |
> and put it in your /var/bind/domain.tld.hosts file, assuming your using |
| 13 |
> Bind. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I have it. But that is for other MTA's receiving mails from my one. |
| 16 |
I want to use SPF for incomming mails too... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> I use Postfix and recommend you switch. If you want to filter incoming |
| 19 |
> mail with SPF then you have to configure some stuff in the |
| 20 |
> /etc/postfix/main.cf and /etc/postfix/master.cf files. Google it for the |
| 21 |
> way to do it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks, but I'd prefer to stick with sendmail till the end of its days. |
| 24 |
Or at least till the first usable sendmailX/MeTA1, whatever comes first... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>wrote: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> There are a number of SPF milters that can be used, but (AFAIK) none of |
| 30 |
> them are in the portage tree. The one I use is sm-spf |
| 31 |
> (http://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-spf.html). |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
Finally someone who does not suggest me to switch to other MTA! |
| 35 |
btw, It is strange, there is a milter for SenderID (which iirc is in some |
| 36 |
way |
| 37 |
close to Microsoft) in portage tree, but nothing for openSPF. I will try to |
| 38 |
make an ebuild. Maybe there are still more "real unix admins" using |
| 39 |
old'n'good sendmail. But no flame over "which MTA is better", please. |
| 40 |
(anyway, we all know Sendmail is the best! :-) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Jarry |
Archives