1 |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:05:19PM +0000, Penguin Lover Grant Edwards squawked: |
2 |
> > Can you show the contents of python-updater -vp? |
3 |
> |
4 |
> # python-updater -vp |
5 |
> [...] |
6 |
> unrecognised option: -vp |
7 |
|
8 |
Oops, my bad. |
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> Running python-updater -v -p says this (all packages except |
12 |
> openoffice have been emerged at least once since python was |
13 |
> updated): |
14 |
> |
15 |
> * Starting Python Updater from 2.4 to 2.5 : |
16 |
> * check "soname" enabled. |
17 |
> * check "pylibdir" enabled. |
18 |
> * check "eclass" disabled. |
19 |
> * check "manual" enabled. |
20 |
> * Adding to list: =dev-libs/boost-1.34.1-r2 |
21 |
> * check: manual [Added to list manually] |
22 |
> * Adding to list: =x11-libs/vte-0.16.14 |
23 |
> * check: manual [Added to list manually] |
24 |
> * Adding to list: =app-office/gnumeric-1.8.3 |
25 |
> * check: manual [Added to list manually] |
26 |
> * Adding to list: =app-office/openoffice-2.4.1 |
27 |
> * check: soname [ Libraries linked to old libpython found: |
28 |
> * libpython2.4.so.1.0 /usr/lib/openoffice/program/pythonloader.uno.so libpython2.4.so.1.0 /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libpyuno.so |
29 |
> * ] |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
Okay, then, it is not a bug. The packages listed belong to the |
33 |
PKGS_MANUAL set defined the python-updater. The comment there says: |
34 |
|
35 |
"packages that should be re-emerged even if they don't fit the |
36 |
criteria (eg. ones that have pythong compiled statically)" |
37 |
|
38 |
So that is the designed behaviour. I would prefer it like this rather |
39 |
than having packages that need re-emerging omitted. That said, you can |
40 |
pass the flag |
41 |
|
42 |
-dmanual |
43 |
|
44 |
to disable re-emerging those packages. (You can even fine tune which |
45 |
sets you want to re-emerge.) Read the python-updater man page for |
46 |
details. |
47 |
|
48 |
HTH, |
49 |
|
50 |
W |
51 |
-- |
52 |
A backwards poet writes inverse. |
53 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 648 days, 14:57 |