1 |
Nick~ |
2 |
Would your consensus also agree with Hans-Werner's on this? |
3 |
The problem was (posted earlier) that having ipw2100/ieee80211 compiled in |
4 |
and then adding iptables to the kernel caused the wireless to go south on a |
5 |
reboot. |
6 |
>> That incorporation of netfilter into the kernel changes some internal |
7 |
>> structs, i guess. So you need to recompile your other modules (ipw2100 |
8 |
>> and fellows - at least the network-dependent) for the new kernel. |
9 |
|
10 |
I'd like to get this running, so I can setup firestarter on my laptop. |
11 |
|
12 |
Thanks for your input. |
13 |
|
14 |
John D |
15 |
|
16 |
-----Original Message----- |
17 |
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:neil@××××××××××.uk] |
18 |
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:56 AM |
19 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
20 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables |
21 |
|
22 |
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:43:26 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote: |
23 |
|
24 |
> > "We recommend you enable _everything_ except ipchains support and |
25 |
> > ipfwadm support as modules under this menu" |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I never read this as meaning that everything should be selected, but |
28 |
> rather that everything that you select under this menu, other than |
29 |
> ipchains support and ipfwadm, should be selected as a module rather than |
30 |
> static. |
31 |
|
32 |
That interpretation would also mean that you should enable ipchains as |
33 |
static, something you wouldn't want. But it is a highly ambiguous |
34 |
statement. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Neil Bothwick |
39 |
|
40 |
The best antiques are old friends. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |